Natural Selection
Adaptations are structures or behaviors that allow efficient use
of the environment. For example, the webbed foot of a duck enables it to
swim better than a foot that is not webbed.
Adaptations are due to genes, that is,
they are inherited.
Natural selection operates to produce individuals that are better adapted to their
environment. It is important to keep in mind as you read below that natural
selection does not act on individuals; it acts on populations.
Individual organisms cannot become better-adapted to their environment
because they cannot change their genes.
Natural selection produces changes in the genetic composition of a population from one generation to the next. As a result, organisms become
better adapted to their environment.
- Individuals within a population vary; they are not all identical.
- Some variants are “better” than others.
- The traits that vary are heritable.
- The “better” individuals will have more success reproducing; they will
have more offspring.
In successive generations, more offspring will have the better traits.
These items are discussed below.
| For many traits that occur in a population, individuals are often not all
identical. For example, if running speed were measured, some individuals would
likely be able to run faster than others but most individuals would probably
be
intermediate.
If number of individuals is plotted against the trait in question
(running speed for example), a graph like the one shown is often produced. |
 |
| We would get a similar bell-shaped curve if we plotted height,
weight, performance on exams, etc. |
 |
Some Variants are Better
Some individuals are bound to be better than others. Perhaps
their body structure allows them to escape predators better or to find food
faster or to better provide for their young. For example, suppose that the
faster-running animals diagrammed below are better able to escape predators
than the slower ones. You would expect that more of the faster ones would
survive and reproduce than the slower ones.

The slower rabbits will not reproduce as much because
predators kill them more than they kill the faster rabbits.
Traits Are Heritable
Those individuals that survive better or reproduce more will
pass their superior genes to the next generation. Individuals that do not
survive well or that reproduce less as a result of "poorer genes"
will not pass those genes to the next generation in high numbers. As a
result, the population will change from one generation to the next.
The frequency of individuals with better genes will increase. This process
is called natural selection.
Fitness
We often hear natural selection described as "survival
of the fittest." The word "fitness" used in a biological
context means "reproductive." It does not have anything to do with
physical fitness or strength. In the example above, it is the fastest
rabbits that reproduce the most, not the strongest.
Natural Selection Produces Evolutionary Change
If the conditions discussed above are met, the genetic composition of the
population will change from one generation to the next. This process is called natural
selection.
The word "evolution" refers to a change in the
genetic composition of a population. Natural selection produces evolutionary
change because it changes the genetic composition of populations.
A variety of other mechanisms can also produce evolutionary change. For example,
suppose that 65% of the eye-color genes in a population were for individuals with blue
eyes and 35% of the genes were for brown eyes. If most of the immigrants entering the
population carried the blue gene, the overall composition might change from 65% blue to
70% blue.
Evolution occurs in populations, not in individuals. Although mechanisms
exist for individual bacteria to change their genetic composition,
multicellular organisms do not change their genetic characteristics and
therefore cannot evolve. Natural selection does not act on an
individual to make it better adapted to its environment.
There are two forms of the peppered moth (Biston betularia) in
England- a
dark-colored form (carbonaria) and a light form (typica).
In the early 1800's, most moths were the light form. The first dark
form was reported in 1848. The dark form
increased in frequency during the last half of the 1800s. By 1895, 98% of
the Moths in Manchester were the dark form.
The increase in the dark (carbonaria) form of the moth occurred at a time
of rapid industrialization in England- the industrial revolution. During this time, an increase in the amount of
coal-burning factories caused widespread pollution. The pollution killed
light-colored lichens,
causing the trees to be darker. The trees in polluted areas were also
covered with dark soot.
In 1896, J. W. Tutt proposed that bird predation was responsible for the
increase in abundance of the dark form of the moth. He reasoned that birds
had difficulty
seeing the dark form on the dark trees; the moths were camouflaged and
survived better. In clean areas, the trees were covered with lichens,
making the pale form more difficult for birds to see. In the early
1800s, the trees were light and the light form were more difficult to see.
To test the bird predation hypothesis, H.B.D. Kettlewell released moths of each type
and then measured the number that were later recaptured. The experiment was
performed in a polluted area in Birmingham, England and in a clean area in
Dorset. The moths were marked with a dot of paint so that he could identify
them after they were released and then recaptured. In the unpolluted area, he recaptured 13.7% light, 4.7% dark indicating that
the light form survived better. In the polluted area, he recaptured 13% light and
27.5% dark suggesting that the dark form survived better.
These results support the hypothesis that color change was due to bird
predation. Birds ate moths that were easiest to find.
Sexual Reproduction and Evolutionary Change
Variation
Later in this course, we will discuss how sexual reproduction acts to
increase variation in populations by shuffling genes. Offspring have some genes from each of two different
parents and therefore are not identical clones of their parents. The increased
variation due to sexual reproduction allows natural selection (and thus
evolution) to produce changes in populations as described above.
Fluctuating environments
Evolutionary change due to natural selection would not be necessary if the
environment never changed and the organisms within the environment were
optimally adapted to the environment. For example, imagine a plant that is
adapted to an environment that has an average annual rainfall of 100 cm.
If the climate were to change so that the amount of rainfall decreased,
individuals that could tolerate less rain would survive and reproduce better,
thus establishing their drought-tolerant genes in subsequent generations. If
there was no variation in the plant population, there would not be any
drought-tolerant individuals and the species would likely go extinct in areas
of decreased rainfall.
Sexual reproduction therefore, enables species to survive in
fluctuating or changing environments because it promotes variation, which in
turn allows natural selection.
|