

ML HOME | email me Michael Lawliss
| CLINTON
CHE 101 - Applied Chemistry
Research Papers:
Critical Thinking and Research Assignment
- Debunking or Supporting a ‘Science Based’ myth/Urban Legend.
-
- Write a two page paper on the instructor approved myth/legend of
your choice.
- You will need to address the following:
-
- 1 – Explain the myth/legend in plain terms.
- – Define the parameters in which
this myth is supposed to be true. i.e. Eggs balance on the equinox.
-
- 2 – Expound on the facts and present data and information in an
unbiased manner.
- – Gather your sources and information being VERY careful
where you get your informatio:.
- – Is your source simply relaying information that they gathered, or
- did
your source actually perform a test, conduct scientific experimentation,
is an authority on the subject etc.
– Find the Science behind the myth/legend.
- (You should try to go to the source or get
information directly.)
- Be as OBJECTIVE and UNBIASED as possible.
-
-
- 3 – Then reveal your own conclusion about the truthfulness of the
myth/legend.
- – Based on your research
give your opinion about the myth/legend, and be prepared to argue your
stance.
-
– Is the myth itself false. That is ‘is it a complete falsehood’ or lie?
- Or: – Is it based on some science or truth that has been twisted or
misunderstood?
- Or: – Is it completely true?
-
Show evidence, facts etc. that support this.
-
-
- APA
Page at CCC
Health Note Research Oral Presentation
-
- The purpose of this paper is for you to do scientific research on a topic
that relates chemistry to personal health.
- Your assignment is to present a ten minute talk on a specific subject,
your presentation must be complete and informative.
-
- 1 – Choose a topic. Make
sure the topic is narrow enough to do a thorough report on.
-
E.g. If your topic is Lung Cancer.. it would be too broad to cover
completely in 10 minutes.
-
Choose one aspect of Lung Cancer, like: Discussing the compounds in
cigarette smoke and what each does to you.
-
- 2 – Research the topic. Choose
your sources carefully. Remember
that .COM websites are usually trying to sell you something.
- .ORG websites are usually nonprofit/ noncommercial sites, .GOV
websites are government sites and .EDU websites are schools.
EACH type has good and bad aspects.
Remember to examine who is the author and double check evidence with
more than one source.
- - Online Journals are a good
source. Professional journals
will have up to date articles and many journals heavily screen
their content.
- - Manufacturer’s data
sheets ( Spec sheets; MSDS ) are a good source.
- - Document
your sources.
-
- 3 – Organize your research into a presentation that has a focus and
flow. Try to explain the point
of your presentation as well. Keep
the information at an appropriate level, challenging enough to make it
interesting but not over the audience’s head. Since your audience is your peers you can use yourself as a
measure of how easy or difficult the material will be to comprehend.
-
- 4 – Use instructional aids like: Power Point; posters, real items
(tools, real samples, models, live examples). The added bonus of having a real item for your audience to
touch or examine is extremely beneficial.
-
- 5 – Practice your presentation at least once.
-
- 6 – Enjoy doing the research. Since YOU get to pick the topic, it should be one you are
ready to spend some time learning about.
-
-
YOU
WILL BE GRADED ON YOUR REPORT USING THE FOLLOWING RUBRIC:
- Category
|
- Description
|
-
|
- Points
|
- Oral presentation /
Time
-
|
- - How well you presented the material.
- - Did the presentation’s ideas flow well.
- - Did you stick to the time allowance.
- Reading directly from your notes, going over the time limit will
cost you points, etc.
|
- - 5
- - 10
- - 5
|
- 20
|
- Content presented at appropriate level
-
|
- - The report was challenging enough to make people think yet easy
enough to be enjoyable Difficult points were explained well
enough.
- Background and vocabulary were explained.
|
- - 20
|
- 20
|
- Covered Topic chosen, and had the Proper Focus
-
|
- - Did the report cover the topic well enough.
- The report was
complete, well planned with respect to the material and did not leave
gaps.
- - The report was aimed at the chemistry behind the topic.
|
- - 20
-
-
- - 10
|
- 30
|
- Research
Mat. /Bibliography
-
|
- - Sources were appropriate for the topic.
- - Enough sources were used and your bibliography was done correctly.
- - Links to internet sources were valid.
|
- - 5
- - 10
-
- - 5
|
- 20
|
- Extra Materials – teaching aids – group participation
-
|
- - Use of extra material: anything that will enhance the
presentation, anything above and beyond your voice or you writing on
the board. Materials MUST
be incorporated into the presentation. This includes: power points,
posters, live specimens (clear with me first), models, pictures. NOT
printed pages from the internet.
|
- - 10
|
- 10
|
APA
Page at CCC
Example
of citing a TV Show:
"Trash
of the Titans." The Simpsons, Season 9. Dir. Jim Reardon, Mark
Kirkland, et al. Voices: Dan Castellaneta, Julie Kavner, Nancy Cartwright,
Yeardley Smith, Hank Azaria, Harry Shearer. CBS. KPIX, San Francisco. 10
September 2006.
Contact info:
| Room 221 Stafford Center for Art,
Science and Technology |
| Clinton Community College |
| 136 Clinton Pt. Dr. |
| Plattsburgh, NY 12901 |
|
518-562-4337 |
CCC HOME | MATH
SCIENCE HOME PAGE |
