Evolution and Population GeneticsReview
Evolution and Population GeneticsEvolution Occurs in Populations
There is not a good definition of species; perhaps the concept of species is artificial but it is useful because it allows people to classify organisms. Most biologists would agree that members of a sexually-reproducing species are able to interbreed and have a shared gene pool. Different species do not exchange genes with each other; they do not interbreed. This definition of species is based on sexual reproduction and therefore does not work with prokaryotes or other asexual species. PopulationA population is an interbreeding group of organisms (the same species) that occupies a particular area. The size of the area is somewhat arbitrary. There could be a population of fish in an aquarium and a population of fish in a lake. Gene Frequency and EvolutionGene frequency refers to the proportion of alleles that are of a particular type. For example, if 60% of the alleles in a population are "a" and 40% are "A", then the gene frequency of "a" is 0.6 and the gene frequency of "A" is 0.4. On a small scale, evolution involves changes in gene frequencies. Population Model
Circles are used to represent genes in this diagram of a population. Individuals are diploid, so two circles are used to represent an individual.
Gene Frequencies in the Model PopulationIn the population above, 33% of the genes for eye color in a population are "A" and 67% are "a". The frequency of "A" is therefore 0.33 and the frequency of "a" is 0.67. GametesDuring meiosis, "AA" individuals will produce all "A" gametes. Similarly, 1/2 of the gametes produced by an "Aa" individuals will be "A" and the other half will be "a"; "aa" individuals will produce all "a" gametes.
The proportion of A and a in the gametes will be the same as in the population. In the example population we have been using, suppose that each individual produces four gametes.
In reality, males produce many millions of gametes and females produce relatively few. This is not a concern for our model because in either case, the gene frequency of the gametes will be the same as that of the population that produced them.
Gene frequency: The next generationBecause the gene frequency in the gamete pool did not change, the gene frequency in the population the next generation remains the same. The Hardy-Weinberg law states that under certain conditions (discussed below), the gene frequency of a population does not change from generation to generation.
The population model described above predicts that gene frequencies will not change from one generation to the next even if there are more recessive alleles. There is sometimes a misconception among students beginning to study genetics that dominant traits are more common than recessive traits. It isn't true. For example, blood type O is recessive and is the most common type of blood. Huntington's (a disease of the nervous system) is caused by a dominant gene and the normal gene is recessive. Fortunately, most people are recessive; the dominant is uncommon. The misconception comes from the observation that in a cross of Aa X Aa, 3/4 of the offspring will show the dominant characteristic. However, the 3:1 ratio comes only if the parents are both Aa. If there are many recessive genes in a population, then most matings are likely to be aa X aa and most offspring will be aa. Forces that Change Gene FrequenciesMigration can change the gene frequency of a population if the migrants have a different gene frequency than that of the population they are leaving or entering.
The founder effect occurs when the gene frequency of a newly established population is somewhat different from the parental population. This may be due to the small sample of founding individuals. The sample-size phenomenon can be illustrated by flipping a coin. The expected number of "heads" from flipping a coin is 50% but if a coin is flipped only 4 times, you may get all "heads" or all "tails". If the coin is flipped 1000 times, the actual number of "heads" and "tails" will probably not deviate much from 50%. Thus, the larger the sample size of emigrants, the more likely it is to reflect the population from which it is leaving. Below: The population on the right was formed from a few individuals emigrating from the population on the left.
During a bottleneck, a large population undergoes a decrease in size so that relatively few individuals remain. Because there are few individuals, the gene frequency is more likely to drift. Below: The gene frequency of the initial population (left) changes because many of the individuals have died. The population on the right is the same population after the bottleneck has occurred.
Genetic drift refers to random fluctuations in the gene frequency of a population. This is more likely to occur in a small population. As with bottlenecks and the founder effect, it is a sample-size phenomenon. The smaller the population, the more likely that gene frequencies are likely to fluctuate from generation to generation.
Mutation changes gene frequencies when genes of one type ("A" for example) mutate to another type ("a" for example).
Natural selection changes gene frequencies when genes or gene combinations are more likely to result in greater reproductive success of the individual that possesses them. Conditions Necessary for Hardy-Weinberg EquilibriumNotice that the gene frequency the next generation is the same as that of the initial population. The Hardy-Weinberg principle states that if the following conditions are met, the gene frequency of a population will not change from generation to generation:
Natural Selection
Natural selection occurs because
Example of Natural Selection: Industrial MelanismKettlewell studied the peppered moth (Biston betularia) from insect collections in England. He observed that in polluted areas, most of the peppered moths were the dark form. In clean areas, most were the pale form. During the early 1800's, the dark form comprised less than 2% of the population and the pale form made up more than 98%. During the 1800’s the dark form increased in frequency in urban areas. Kettlewell suggested that dark moths survived better in polluted areas because they were more difficult for avian (bird) predators to see on the darkened tree trunks. Similarly, he suggested that light-colored moths were more difficult to see in unpolluted areas because the tree trunks were light-colored. To test this, he released moths of each type (light and dark) in both polluted and unpolluted areas. In the unpolluted area, he recaptured 13.7% of the light moths and 4.7% of the dark moths. In the polluted area, he recaptured 13% of the light and 27.5% of the dark moths. Sexual Reproduction and Evolutionary Change
Individuals with in a population usually are not all identical and much of this variation is due to genetic differences among individuals. Model Chromosomes
|
| The Biology Web Home page |